本文介绍了是否可以将委托作为属性参数?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
是否可以将委托作为属性的参数?
Is it possible to have a delegate as the parameter of an attribute?
像这样:
public delegate IPropertySet ConnectionPropertiesDelegate();
public static class TestDelegate
{
public static IPropertySet GetConnection()
{
return new PropertySetClass();
}
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Interface,AllowMultiple=false,Inherited=true)]
public class WorkspaceAttribute : Attribute
{
public ConnectionPropertiesDelegate ConnectionDelegate { get; set; }
public WorkspaceAttribute(ConnectionPropertiesDelegate connectionDelegate)
{
ConnectionDelegate = connectionDelegate;
}
}
[Workspace(TestDelegate.GetConnection)]
public class Test
{
}
如果不可能,有什么明智的选择?
And if its not possible, what are the sensible alternatives?
推荐答案
不,您不能将委托作为属性构造函数参数.查看可用类型:属性参数类型
作为一种解决方法(尽管它很麻烦且容易出错),您可以创建一个 带反射的委托:
No, you cannot have a delegate as an attribute constructor parameter. See available types: Attribute parameter types
As a workaround (although it's hacky and error prone) you can create a delegate with reflection:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Interface, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
public class WorkspaceAttribute : Attribute
{
public ConnectionPropertiesDelegate ConnectionDelegate { get; set; }
public WorkspaceAttribute(Type delegateType, string delegateName)
{
ConnectionDelegate = (ConnectionPropertiesDelegate)Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(ConnectionPropertiesDelegate), delegateType, delegateName);
}
}
[Workspace(typeof(TestDelegate), "GetConnection")]
public class Test
{
}
这篇关于是否可以将委托作为属性参数?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯您的权益请联系我们删除!