标准委员会关心的异乎寻常的架构

本文介绍了标准委员会关心的异乎寻常的架构的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！

问题描述

我知道 C 和 C++ 标准保留了语言实现的许多方面，只是因为如果存在具有其他特征的架构，那么为它编写符合标准的编译器将非常困难或不可能.

I know that the C and C++ standards leave many aspects of the language implementation-defined just because if there is an architecture with other characteristics, it would be very difficult or impossible to write a standard conforming compiler for it.

我知道 40 年前，任何计算机都有自己独特的规格.但是，我不知道今天使用的任何架构:

I know that 40 years ago any computer had its own unique specification. However, I don't know of any architectures used today where:

CHAR_BIT != 8
signed 不是二进制补码(我听说 Java 有这个问题).
浮点不符合 IEEE 754(我的意思是不在 IEEE 754 二进制编码中").

CHAR_BIT != 8
signed is not two's complement (I heard Java had problems with this one).
Floating point is not IEEE 754 compliant ( I meant "not in IEEE 754 binary encoding").

我问的原因是，我经常向人们解释说，C++ 不强制要求任何其他低级方面(如固定大小的类型)是件好事^†.这很好，因为与其他语言"不同，它使您的代码在正确使用时可移植(因为它可以移植到更多架构而无需模拟机器的低级方面，例如符号+幅度架构上的二进制补码算法).但我很难过自己无法指出任何具体的架构.

The reason I'm asking is that I often explain to people that it's good that C++ doesn't mandate any other low-level aspects like fixed sized types^†. It's good because unlike 'other languages' it makes your code portable when used correctly ( because it can be ported to more architectures without requiring emulation of low-level aspects of the machine, like e.g. two's complement arithmetic on sign+magnitude architecture). But I feel bad that I cannot point to any specific architecture myself.

所以问题是:哪些架构具有上述特性?

So the question is: what architectures exhibit the above properties?

† uint*_ts 是可选的.

标准委员会关心的异乎寻常的架构

问题描述

推荐答案

相关文档推荐